//
archives

Bombardier

This category contains 61 posts

UPDATE: OMG ! Bombardier Inc. released its 1st Half 2017 Results, not good as expected. Total revenue $7.668B (down 6.7% on 1H/2016). BCA (Bombardier Commercial Aircraft), just 35 deliveries down from 47 in 1H/2016 (down 25.5%) and revenue down 14.4% on 1H/2016 with average discounting of 31% off list prices. Meanwhile, Q400 down to 31 orders in backlog (14 months of production), production down 21% (just 2.16 per month) on 2016, 13 deliveries and 13 orders, book to bill 1.0. CRJ line down to 47 orders in backlog (14 questionable CRJ-1000’s with just 54 deliveries in 7 years), production down 35% (just 2.5 per month) on 2016, 15 deliveries and just 10 new orders, so book to bill just 0.67. CSeries, NO new order in 2017, only 2 x CS300’s ordered in the past 15 months, yes an absolute sales & marketing ‘disaster’ from the “dream team”, but 7 were delivered (1.16 per month) yay ! whopee ! Only 65 business jet deliveries (down from 73 in 1H/2016) while revenue down 13.8% on 1H/2016. Now, all eyes are on US Commerce Department decision September 25th in regard to imposing countervailing duties on the CSeries of up to 79% for basically ‘illegal state aid’ to Bombardier by Ottawa and Quebec, and another 79% duty for anti-dumping, basically selling the CSeries a whole lot cheaper in the USA, to Delta Air Lines, then back at home to say Porter Airlines. An unfavorable ruling will shut the struggling CSeries program (320 orders in 9+ years, with +20% ‘questionable’ still) out of the all important US market, as if the program needed more problems ? Light at the end of the tunnel for BCA ? China, either Comac acquisition or lots of CSeries orders from there, or both, as orders in China for CSeries, Q400 and maybe CRJ will come easier if under Comac, its the only possible ‘white knight’ for struggling BCA, like it or not.

READ: more on Bombardier or other topics by clicking categories on the right. Well today Bombardier Inc. released its 1st half 2017 results, and and its not good, as revenue is down 6.7% to $7.668B on 2016, this company is NOT going to be a $25.0B a year company in 2020 as planned in its … Continue reading

SUMMARY: Canada’s Viking Air is shutting down its expensive $7.5M Series 400 Twin Otter production for 90 days and laying off 212 workers (46% of work force) as deliveries have exceeded sales for sometime and one cannot live off one’s backlogs for too long before you have “white tails”, which apparently there are 6 right now in Calgary. The 19 seat utility market is tough, roughly 33 aircraft deliveries per year by just 4 OEM’s, and surely no one really makes money in the market ? While Viking has delivered 120 in the past 7 years, it is far short of the 2006 forecast of 440 (at a price of $3.195M) over 10 years (off by 300%). Could the much higher price (+134% on 2006 price) have something to do with the lower demand ? off course like with all the other OEM’s, the high price ($279,000 to $447,000 per passenger seat) has killed the market (B737-800/A320 at around $275,000 per passenger seat), but with very low production rates what can you do ? Nothing ! Now, Viking is looking at the out of production turbine powered $37M per copy CL-415 water bomber as a possible new production program. The turbine CL-415 had just 90 deliveries in 22 years of production (4.1 per year) while the radial engine CL-215 had 125 deliveries over 21 years (6.0 per year), so no BIG market here in water bombers, maybe 4 to 5 per year ? but I think a 30 seat regional amphibian can make a difference, the CL-215C ‘Transport’ (2 delivered to Venezuela long ago) is a 30 to 36 passenger certified version and the market is out there all over the world, more than for a firefighter, and surely another 4 to 5 CL-415C ‘Transport’ per year, can change the business case for re-starting the production line for the CL-415 ? 10 aircraft and $+375M in annual revenue sounds good (that is equivalent to 50 x Series 400’s).

READ” Blog on 2016 Turboprop Market (click General Aviation) for more info on the 19 seat market in the March 9, 2017 issue   Viking Air has announced on May 31, 2017 that it is shutting down production of its $7.5 million Twin Otter Series 400 for 90 days and will lay off 212 starting … Continue reading

SUMMARY: Textron Aviation culls its smallest Citation, the $3.35M CE-510 Mustang after 11 years and 472 deliveries. In 2016, Gulfstream dropped its smallest product, the $15.7M G150 (an improved G100, originally the IAI Astra SPx, never a big seller with just +120 deliveries in total) and the $43.1M Gulfstream G450 (ex-GIV) which will be replaced by the new $44.6M G500. The Very Light jet segment has struggled since 2009 when deliveries hit 236 to a low of just 62 in 2013 and 89 last year by 4 OEM’s. With The Mustang gone, the entry level jet for Textron is now the $4.5M CE-525 M2 to take on the $4.16M Embraer Phenom 100E and the $5.0M HondaJet HA-420, which is now in full production mode after years of certification delays, and a surprising 15 deliveries in 1st Quarter 2017, where deliveries by the top 3 OEM’s of Very Light jets was up to 28 from last years 9, a 211% increase on 1Q/2016, and a sign of new life for a struggling segment ?

The latest news from Textron Aviation, that the company is terminating the smallest member of the Citation line, the $3.35M CE-510 Mustang (PHOTO below), which has had 472 deliveries by the end of 2016, since starting the line in 2006. The Very Light jet market ($3.0M to $5.5M aircraft) has been in decline from 2009 … Continue reading

UPDATE: Bombardier Inc. ex-President & CEO, and as of today also ex-Executive Chairman, Pierre Beaudoin is out at least ! and so are 1st Quarter, 2017 financials. In the first 3 months of 2017, Bombardier’s revenue is down to $3.6B (-7.7% on 1Q/2016) continues its revenue slide (down $3.77B or -18.7% since 2014). Aircraft deliveries for 1Q/17 are down to just 44 aircraft (15 Commercial and 29 Business) , Q400 deliveries were 6 with just 26 orders in backlog (13 months), CRJ deliveries were 8 with just 54 orders in backlog (20 months), and only 1 CS300 delivered. Bombardier delivered 29 business jets, more skewed to light jets as the top end market is struggling these days, not good news for the new Global G7000. Meanwhile, only 2 x CS300’s orders in the past 11 months ? the program has a serious problem selling the aircraft, and two, selling above cost at some point is important, no ? Now, Boeing wants US Commerce Dept. to place a $13.4M “price dumping” tariff on the CSeries deal with Delta Air Lines and ban the aircraft from further US sales, meanwhile ATR and Embraer are complaining to the WTO of Canadian “illegal state aid” to Bombardier, criminal bribery investigation under way in Sweden and yet the top 5 executives wanted a 50% increase for an “Exceptional 2016” seriously ? One wonders what “planet” these executives live on ? and where is this “magical” 7,000 deliveries in 20 years in the 100 to 150 passenger market ? This CSeries program is still with just 320 orders (no 40 for Republic, just PR deferral till the end of time) after 9 years ? maybe they got the market positioning all wrong ? What happened to the “game changer” ? and the “dream team” ? that was suppose to sell lots of CSeries ? Those Top 5 executives need to go, 1 down 4 to go ? Lastly, Porter Airlines (Canada) placed a conditional order for 12 x CS100’s and 18 options in April, 2013, show the price offered to Porter and we will all know if they are “price dumping” in the US market or not, easy no ? Behind all the denials they know they are “price dumping” its sadly the only way they know how to sell the CSeries, yup all 340 orders below cost !

READ more on Bombardier on this Blog, just click Bombardier under Categories on the right side of menu.   The 1st Quarter results are out for Bombardier, but the most important news is that Executive Chairman, Pierre Beaudoin is stepping down after numerous problems and Revenue declines. The man I refer to as the “Destroyer” … Continue reading

UPDATE: Bombardier, the Canadian Government and 49.5% owner of the CSeries program (through CSALP) the Quebec Government are together discounting Boeing’s claim that Bombardier is “price dumping” the struggling CSeries program on the US market (Delta Air Lines order for 75 x CS100’s in April, 2016). In short, “price dumping” means much lower prices on the export market than in a home market. Most likely its true that Bombardier is offering +60% discounts on the CSeries, which means selling below cost and at a loss. Having just 320 orders after 9 years, the company is desperate for orders, and purchase price is the #1 determinant these days by all airlines. Now, Boeing is seeking an order against the sale of the CSeries aircraft in the US market. That would be a severe blow to Bombardier and the CSeries as no commercial aircraft has gone on to be a success, without major sales in the US market (e.g. Viscounts, BAC 1-11, VC-10, Concorde, Saab 2000, Fokker F50, Fokker F-70, Dornier 328/328Jet, etc.), though the US market is not as dominant as it once was, it is still crucial for every commercial aircraft OEM. This is the stuff, President Trump loves, big announcements that he is saving the US workers jobs against foreign companies that don’t play by the rules, for Bombardier the timing could not be any worst. But they wanted “state aid” and with it comes the perception of “illegal state aid”, and Boeing is not the only one to complain against Bombardier, as Airbus and ATR have made moves to go to the WTO (World trade Organization) to investigate Canadian state aid to Bombardier. Now, most Canadians know that “state aid” or “corporate welfare” is going to the company from our pockets, this has been on going for 50+ years and sadly its all a “state secret” even though its public money going to a private company. Canadians have no idea how much taxpayers money was given or returned by Bombardier, for it is THE symbol of Quebec’s industrial capabilities, and always treated “special” here in Canada by most governments in power since the 1970’s. It was then that Quebec started to contemplate breaking away from Canada and becoming its own independent state, and that is why it has been given so much money and cheap deals on privatization of Canadair $120M in 1986 and de Havilland $100M in 1992 from which the whole Challenger, CRJ, Global,DHC-8 and Q400 aircraft products all came from.

The Canadian Government off course is standing by Bombardier on this, but as I have been on this issues since the Delta Air lines deal, I know through contacts and Boeing knows even better what the price to Delta Air Lines (DAL) was. Now comes a lot of trouble, which was expected as the CSeries … Continue reading

SUMMARY: Boeing has complained to the Trump Administration and the International Trade Commission about Bombardier’s “price dumping” in the 2016 Delta Air Lines (DAL) deal for 75 x CS100’s. Which according to Boeing was done at a price of $19.6M per unit (72% off list price), on an aircraft Boeing says costs $33.2M to produce, a loss of $13.6M per unit (yes, a -69% profit margin) and a total loss of $1.02B on the Delta deal. That is even lower than my highly criticized numbers from “industry experts” for the past 12 months , using a price of $22M (69% off list price), CS100 production cost of $29M and a loss of $7M per unit, a $525M total loss, now the loss on the DAL deal using Boeing numbers is 94% ($495M) higher than what I calculated a year ago. So much for Bombardier’s BS “onerous contract provision” of $492 in 2016 that everyone pointed to as the “loss”. Now Bombardier’s desperation for CSeries sales is out in the open. It “dumped” prices way below cost, in fact all 320 CSeries orders (in 9 years of dismal sales/marketing) are priced below cost and surely Air Canada’s 2016 deal (45 x CS300’s) was at a huge discount of +/-72% as well, and the total loss could be as high $612M on top of the DAL deal. So Bombardier sold 120 aircraft in 2016 on 2 BIG deals, that may end up being a loss of $1.63B and the greedy top 5 Executives at Bombardier wanted a 50% pay raise last month for a “Exceptional” 2016 ? BS, they should all be fired! As well, since last May’s deal with DAL, only ONE order for the CSeries has been booked, from Air Tanzania for just 2 x C300’s, yes 12 months and 3 big Air Shows (Farnborough, Dubai, Zhuhai) and just 2 aircraft orders and no one is worried ? seriously ? Meanwhile, Airbus has 5,056 orders for its new A320neo family and Boeing has 3,703 orders for its new B737Max family. Lots of talk about new sales at Bombardier (BA, Spirit, JetBlue, etc.), but since there are just 4 OEM’s, every airline will want to talk to each OEM when doing a deal to get the lowest cost. The problem is NOT the CSeries, its fantastic, but very low demand in the 100-150 passenger market, coupled to intense price competition by the duopoly makes life impossible for the CSeries. With all 320 CSeries sold below cost, why be in the business ? as the deliveries of these 320 aircraft will take Bombardier well into 2021, with a big loss every year of production, I see NO light at the end of the tunnel, other than an acquisition by COMAC (China) that needs Bombardier’s know how in support, training and sales/marketing ? and its the only commercial aircraft OEM that can be bought.

READ more on Bombardier, just click and see past Articles on the troubled OEM. https://www.linkedin.com/in/tomas-chlumecky-3200a021/ I have been saying for a long time that the move to make the CSeries a government owned program by spinning off the program into a new limited partnership (CSALP-CSeries Aircraft Limited Partnership), where the Province of Quebec has 49.5% … Continue reading

SUMMARY: Beautiful, high technology aircraft are great, but do NOT guarantee commercial success, in the end its about meeting customers’ needs rather than on selling a ‘product’, and here lies the problem with Bombardier’s CSeries sales. The company came out with its so-called “game changer” in July, 2008 (yes 9 years ago and yet only 320 orders today), with claims it is 20% more fuel efficient and has 15% lower cash operating costs than currently produced aircraft with a fantasy forecast that 7,000 aircraft over 20 years will be delivered in the 100 to 150 passenger segment ? and it all sounded like they had a “winner”. BUT with low fuel prices and interest rates and airlines up-gauging from smaller 100-150 passenger airliners, the CSeries ‘benefits’ have fallen on deaf ears with airline executives, unless a huge +65% discount is offered to make the deal (e.g. LH, DL, AC, etc.), yet the only CSeries deal done in the past 12 months since the hugely discounted 75 x CS100 deal with Delta Air Lines (Loss to Bombardier of $+/-525M), has been 2 x CS300’s to little known Air Tanzania ? Meanwhile Airbus has accumulated 5,056 orders for its A320neo line and Boeing’s Max line has 3,703 orders. Is there a lesson here for OEM’s ? Off course, “don’t count your chickens before they hatch”.

Check out previous Articles on Bombardier, Commercial Aircraft, Low Cost Airlines, General Aviation, Regional Airlines to Airline Management and Mergers and Acquisitions https://www.linkedin.com/in/tomas-chlumecky-3200a021/recent-activity/posts/   We forget that high tech fantastic aircraft do not add up to commercial success (PHOTOS BELOW: Concorde (Mach 2+ airliner), Canada’s Avro C-102 Jetliner (2nd jet airliner to fly after the … Continue reading

SUMMARY: Bombardier’s on going 5 Year Transformation Plan looks to $25 billion in Revenue by 2020 (+53% on 2016 Revenue of $16.33 billion which is down 18.8% or $3.8 billion since 2014), with $15 billion (60%) to come from Aerospace, Commercial Aircraft (BCA to $5 billion + 129% on 2016) and Business Aircraft (BBA to $9 billion +54% on 2016). I look at how realistic that is given the CSeries poor sales after 8+ years (320) and several old, tired and dying programs that need to be culled, from the Q400, Learjets to the 1970’s designed CL-600 Challenger and its evolutionary cousins the CRJ, G5000/6000 (BBA’s once “cash cow”) and new G7000 line. My take is that Bombardier will fall short by at least $6.5 billion on its Commercial and Business Aircraft goals, as realistically by 2020 all Bombardier will have to sell in Aerospace is its CSeries, the new Global 7000/8000 business jets and the Challenger 350. At the same time all of its products are going to face lot more competition from Airbus, Boeing, Comac (China), Irkut (Russia) and Embraer on the Commercial Aircraft side as the ‘duopoly’ turns into 5 competitors, with Bombardier the weak “5th Wheel”, while Business Aircraft (BBA) is facing new competing aircraft from Gulfstream (G500/600), Dassault (Falcon 5X/8X) and Textron (Longitude/Hemisphere). Bombardier is also facing a ‘perfect storm’ of tougher global market, economic and political forces that will challenge Bombardier’s on going struggle to become financially viable without taxpayers Government money. Empowered by ‘state aid’ the company is now arrogant enough to launch another new aircraft program, as Sweden is investigating serious bribery charges against the company and the top 5 Bombardier executives get almost 49% pay increase for what I do not know ? yet 14,500 employees are being laid off, and the “gong show” at Bombardier continues.

READ MORE ON BOMBARDIER on this Blog just go to ‘Categories’ and click on Bombardier https://www.linkedin.com/in/tomas-chlumecky-3200a021/recent-activity/posts/ ———————————————————————————————————————————————————————————– Bombardier Inc. released its 2016 Annual Report last month and while the company had Revenues of $US 16.339 billion in 2016 (down 18.7% on Revenue of $20.111 billion in 2014) and recorded a Net Loss of $981 million … Continue reading

SUMMARY: Bombardier is looking into upgrading its CRJ line, which after +1,864 deliveries is now down to around +/-58 orders at best in backlog or 14 months of current production (April, 2018). The sad reality is that the CRJ is no longer very competitive against the current Embraer E175 and the new E175/190-E2’s will make the CRJ obsolete, in fact since 2003 it has been in decline and losing market share to Embraer for 14 years and the order backlog is now “critically” low. After having upgraded the CRJ cabins in 2016, now the focus is on possible new engine (unknown at this time), but that is an expensive upgrade versus the current GE CF34 engines, and adds weight, which for a long fuselage aircraft like the 119 foot long CRJ-900, with rear mounted engines is not good for C of G issues. With only 19 CRJ orders in 2016, Bombardier has been milking and living off its backlog, but is there any life for the CRJ really ? even after +/-30% discounts off list price, sales are not impressive anymore. The CRJ is a 1970’s Canadair CL-600 Challenger (the Type Certificate for all CRJ’s), stretched 4 times with a tight cabin width of just 8 feet and 5 inches (2.69 meters) that has been become a 50 then 70 then 85 and finally 104 passenger airliner, while Embraer designed and built the EJets from scratch, and that is now paying off got Embraer and blowing up in Bombardier’s face. At a time when the CSeries is still struggling for orders, Bombardier Aerospace needs all of its products to sell and sell, yet the Learjets, Challenger 650, Global G5000/6000, Q400 and CRJ are sadly in the final decline phase of their product life cycle as new competing products are coming online across all segments..

Follow up to the January 4, 2017 Blog “Lots of Talk about Bombardier’s turnaround”   Bombardier is now looking for solutions to keep its CRJ line open for a couple of years as the backlog now dwindles to 14 months at current production rate of 4.2 per month and current order book. Now paying for … Continue reading

SUMMARY: Lots of talk about Bombardier’s Turnaround, 14,500 layoff announcements this year, or 21,450 in the past 3 years. The Global G7000 flew for the first time and Bombardier expects big things from it to boost Bombardier’s bottom line along with the struggling CSeries, which today still has only 320 orders (NO 40 x CS300’s for Republic Airways, just PR not wanting to reduce the meager order book) and still +/- 86 “questionable” orders (representing 26% of the current 320 orders). Lots of effort in reducing labor costs, yet no one is noticing that the top line (revenue) at Aerospace is a coming disaster, and unsustainable with an old product line (1970’s Learjets and Canadair CL-600/Challenger 650, plus the Global G5000/6000) that is facing new and better competition. The CRJ line has no more than 48 orders in backlog, only 18 orders this year (50% from Canada) good for 12 months of production (February, 2018) with no new orders. The Q400 is down to around 34 orders in backlog and only 25 orders this year (50% also from Canada), good for 14 months (March, 2018) with no new orders. The 2020 Turnaround Plan calls for Aerospace to generate $15 billion in revenue (60% of total revenue planned of $25 billion), with just 2 products ? The Plan requires $5 billion from Commercial aircraft, which by 2020 means only the CSeries (CS100/CS300) is left, and that will require at least 140 deliveries at the current highly competitive low prices to hit the “target”, really ? (2020 production is planned at 90-120 aircraft today). Meanwhile, Business jets are to generate $10 billion by 2020, and that will fall on the $75 million Global G7000 (NO Learjets, Challenger 650 and Global G5000/6000’s by 2020) and that means 133+ G7000 deliveries to hit their “target” ? seriously ? has anyone looked at single aisle ACJ and BBJ sales for the past 15 years ? (+/- 15 a year at best). Canada is providing “state aid” (aka taxpayers money) to Bombardier again ($2.5 billion in 2016 from Quebec), in fact of the $3.39 billion of cash on hand as of Sept 30, 2016, $2.5 billion (71% of cash on hand) came from the Government of Quebec, soon another $1.0 billion will most likely come from Ottawa (PM is from Quebec, and they always “help” Bombardier), and then Quebec and Ottawa will be 66.7% owners of the CSeries program (CSALP – CSeries Aircraft Limited Partnership, a separate company, spun off from Bombardier ??). How did we the Canadian taxpayers become “owners” again of a commercial aircraft program that NO commercial aircraft OEM wanted in 2015 when it was for sale for “a song” ? Especially after we the Canadian taxpayers “SOLD” Bombardier, our government owned Canadair in 1986 (for $120 million) and government owned de Havilland in 1992 (for $100 million) with the rights to the Challenger business jet, later stretched into the CRJ line, and the DHC-8 turboprop airliner later stretched into the DHC-8-Q400 line. Meanwhile, Embraer is going to the WTO again to complain about Bombardier’s “illegal state aid”, while Boeing may go to President-elect Donald Trump and get import tariffs applied on the CSeries and then ? Oh, it is going to be an interesting 2017 for sure, stay tuned to the never ending Bombardier/Quebec/Ottawa “gong show”, as they find new ways to screw Canadian taxpayers to keep Bombardier alive at any cost.

Bombardier has now delivered its first CS100 to Swiss and CS300 to airBaltic and talks confidently of a turnaround next year and a bright future in 2020 as per its 5 year Transformation Plan, that should see company become a $US 25 billion a year company by the end of 2020, with Aerospace to provide … Continue reading

UPDATE: Hold on to your wallets Canada ! Bombardier is seeking more money again for a another new aerospace project ! with the so-called “game changer” CSeries an absolute sales disaster with only 318 orders after +8 years of sales ? and right after announcing its 6th wave of layoffs (another 7,500 are to go by 2018) since January, 2014 (34 months ago) for a total of 21,450 jobs gone ! Meanwhile Bombardier’s CEO admits company nearly went bankrupt in 2015, and it now has $3.4 billion in cash, $2.5 billion (74%) came from the Government of Quebec this year (aka bailout money), without Quebec they would have only $900 million in cash today and be close to bankruptcy. Embraer and Boeing are taking the “illegal state aid” case to the WTO. With President-elect Trump coming in, he’s ready to “defend” US corporations from illegal and unfair state aid backed competitors, and don’t be surprised if he tears up NAFTA and hits the CSeries with new tariffs, a perfect scenario for his PR. Everything in decline at Bombardier Aerospace today, the CSeries has only 318 orders (of which 2 have been delivered), what happened to the existing Commercial Aircraft Market Forecast that claims 7,000 deliveries over 20 years (350 per year) ? all BS, in fact Ascend Consultancy forecasts only 1,340 CSeries deliveries over 20 years (67 per year), down 81% on Bombardier’s “fantasy” forecast. No one has noticed, but with only 34 x Q400 orders in backlog and only 60 CRJ’s in backlog, both programs will run out of orders at current production rates of 2.5 per month and 4.2 per month respectively by January, 2018, and with only 13 options for the Q400 and 18 for the CRJ, 2018 looks like the year the Downsview plant gets closed down and everything gets moved to Quebec, another Cartierville Airport deal in the works ? Business jets deliveries are down 25%, and the old Learjets and the 40 year old Challenger 650 (4th variation of Canadair CL-600, which also gave birth to the CRJ line) are down as well, along with the Global G5000/6000’s, NONE of the current products will be around by 2020, except the CSeries (maybe), the new G7000, and possibly still the Challenger 350, but it won’t be a $15 billion a year business, at best $5.5 billion, and I still believe Combardier is coming (China’s COMAC buying Bombardier Aerospace).

OMG, please NO more money for Bombardier’s projects ! Look the company is in deep trouble, just open your eyes and stop listening to the financial “experts” and Bombardier’s BS PR about being “on track” for recovery ? seriously its a disaster and read on to find out why. The recent 7,500 announced layoffs which … Continue reading

SUMMARY: Learjet, the Bombardier business jet brand it bought (a rare Bombardier deal with NO government aid or subsidies) in 1990 for $US 75 million and took on its $US 38 million debt, is soon to be sold as Bombardier struggles with light mid-size jet sales, having only delivered 6 Learjets in the 1st 6 months of 2016. The failure of the Learjet 85 and its subsequent $2.5 billion write down, sealed the fate of Learjet, which has no chance of future sales growth and is losing value year by year with an “old” product line that struggles against the Textron XLS+ and Embraer Legacy 450 in a very “soft” demand environment, where big price discounting is the weapon of choice, especially by Embraer. After 54 years, the sun will set soon on the Learjet brand that Bill Lear started in 1962 using the Swiss P-16 fighter plane as his “inspiration” for the fast Learjet 23, and his LearStar 600 mid-size business jet concept was sold to Canadair in the late 1970’s, which ultimately became the CL-600 Challenger, the grand daddy of the current line of all CRJ regional jets (+1,836 delivered) and the current and 4th version of the 1970’s Challenger (+1,040 delivered), the CL-650 . The buyer may be Textron Aviation, Bombardier’s competitor with its new Latitude, Longitude and eventually Hemisphere lines, as the current 2,300+ Learjets out there (many for sale) still will need continued technical and maintenance support, now worth around $+300 million a year, and could possibly fetch a maximum $375 million price tag, cash that Bombardier desperately needs to reduce its $6.8 billion debt obligations between 2018-2023, so after selling its flight training to CAE in 2015, and its CL-215/415 water bomber rights to Viking Air in June of this year (no price has been published), and now it looks like the Learjet line is next. BUT it will not be the end of Bombardier’s business aviation problems, a tired and old product line (Learjets, CL-650, Global G5000/6000’s) face new products from competitors (Embraer Legacy 500, Falcon 8X, Textron Longitude and Hemisphere, Gulfstream G500/600) all smelling blood at troubled Bombardier.

CHECK OUT August 16, 2016 article on General Aviation delivery summary for 1st half of 2016.   The Learjet product line is about to end anytime soon, as Bombardier looks to sell the brand, which it bought in 1990 for $US 75 million and took on $US 38 million debt, in fact the ONLY aerospace … Continue reading

SUMMARY: Bombardier 1st Half results are out, and it is not good for Aerospace. With only 318 firm CSeries orders today and up to 95 “questionable”, the program suffers from poor sales but even worst, negative margins due to deals below cost, this cannot continue for very long. Yes, 2016 is a tough year for aircraft orders at Airbus and Boeing, and a “price war” is on ! and any big deal will require +65% off list price, which means every new order brings more loses for Bombardier. Meanwhile, CRJ line has only 66 orders in backlog (9 x CRJ-700, 36 x CRJ-900 and 21 x CRJ-1000) good for 25 months of production at the current 2.7 aircraft per month rate, while the Q400 is down to 48 in backlog (40 + 8 recent orders), good to May, 2018 at the current 2.3 aircraft per month. Big discounting under way on the Q400 and CRJ is evident in financials to boost sales, while Business Aircraft orders are slowing down, and production already 20% below last year will be reduced again soon to balance supply and demand. Nothing very promising at Bombardier Aerospace, the company struggles and the 5 year Transformation to 2020 does not look promising at all, market dynamics are creating havoc for Bombardier, but all of that had to have been anticipated when they decided to enter the BIG league and take on Airbus and Boeing, maybe not such a great idea after all ?

LOTS OF ARTICLES IN AVIATION DOCTOR ON BOMBARDIER, TAKE A LOOK. Bombardier (TSX:BBD.B) has released its 1st Half 2016 financials and its time to analyze what is going on at Bombardier so far this year in regard to its struggling Commercial and Business aircraft business. The first 6 months of this year, has seen Bombardier’s … Continue reading

SUMMARY: Bombardier’s rise to become the 3rd largest Commercial Aircraft manufacturer in the world, was due to 4 acquisitions between 1986 and 1992 (1986-Canadair, 1989-Shorts Brothers, 1990-Learjet and 1992-de Havilland), with all but one using billions of Canadian and UK taxpayers money and lots of political help (aka cronyism) to make it happen. The story behind the acquisition headlines, with their give away low acquisition costs, billions in written off aircraft programs, state subsidies and hidden airports that were later sold at big profits, all kept from public eyes. Bombardier’s current product line is 30+ years old, with the 1980’s Challenger CL-600 business jet (now Challenger 650 still in production) from which a family of CRJ regional jet airliners came from, while the early 1980’s 37 passenger DHC-8 is still produced as the 90 passenger Q400. The CSeries is Bombardier first new commercial airliner since it entered the aerospace industry 30 years ago in 6 short years. Contrary to Bombardier’s PR BS, Bombardier is definitely NOT an innovator, just excellent at low risk, low development programs that just stretched existing aircraft, like 12 passenger Challenger CL-600 business jet into the 104 passenger CRJ1000 and the DHC-8-100 into the high density 90 passenger Q400. Attached to the bottom of this article is an paper entitled “The Rise and Fall of Bombardier” and how Bombardier REALLY become an Aerospace power house. The CSeries program is still suffering, Air Canada was enticed to buy by Quebec dropping a long disputed lawsuit against Air Canada and Ottawa offered changes to some legislation, only last weak Air Canada threatened to walk away from the deal as Ottawa had not moved on the legislative changes, and even stated the obvious that “there are other alternatives other than the CSeries”, proving it bought not because it was an aircraft it had to have or needed, but because it was politically coerced to make a deal in crony capitalist Quebec, where politicians and big business are all in bed together to screw Canadian taxpayers, and enrich a few. Meanwhile, the 75 x CS100 Delta Air Lines deal was good for an order WIN, yet the deal is expected to lose $525 million ($7 million per aircraft), and is nothing but a money LOSER deal. Is this the ONLY way Bombardier can sell the CSeries ? through political coercian or selling below cost ? if so then the game will be over soon for the program. But why is the stock up from February’s $0.77 a share ? business deliveries will be off by 25% this year, the Q400 is down to 42 orders in backlog and dying while the CRJ line has 86 in backlog (with 23 x CRJ1000 questionable) and dying as well, high end Global business jet demand is down, while the CSeries even with the Delta and Air Canada deals has only 330 orders (with +25% of existing orders HIGHLY questionable) after 8 years of sales effort ? and with all existing orders currently at a loss, loses are expected well into 2021. Bombardier the world’s only plane and train manufacturer can’t deliver trains on time ! so NO reason to be optimistic, other than the fact Bombardier looks set to DUMP the Cseries program on naive Canadian taxpayers for $2.0 billion for a 2/3 ownership, and raise another $1.0 billion in new stock offering for the new partnership called CSeries Aircraft Limited Partnership (CSALP). Bombardier failed to find a buyer last fall for the CSeries, but now thanks to crony capitalism in Canada, Canadian taxpayers have been suckered into owning the program that NO other aerospace company wanted 9 months ago. Bombardier will get the program off its books and collect $3.0 billion in new capital after writing off $3.2 billion in the CSeries program in 2015. Now the program will be a Canadian government program, and will draw fire from the WTO and the US for state aid, illegal and prohibited subsidies and price dumping, the saga is just beginning and no light at the end of the tunnel for the CSeries.

To my regular readers, I apologize for not writing in the past 6 weeks, been busy with several airline projects in the developing world, but I am back and still not seeing anything positive about the CSeries. Let’s see if Farnborough International Airshow (June 11-17) has anything new from Bombardier, other than the announcement of … Continue reading

UPDATE: Delta Air Lines (DAL) deal for 75 x Bombardier CS100’s and 50 options, is reportedly and as expected, been priced at around 75% OFF the list price to $18.6 million per aircraft, making the 75 aircraft deal not worth the reported $5.6 billion, but only $1.4 billion, and by my estimate a loss of $780 million ($10.8 million per aircraft) on the order, a great deal for DAL but not for Bombardier’s bottom line. Yes, DAL’s Chairman Richard Anderson took full advantage of Bombardier’s desperation for a new Tier 1 airline order (majority of current orders until now have been Tier 2 and 3, small regional/national mediocre customers), and drove a home great deal for DAL and its shareholders, while Bombardier gets a prestigious order after 19 months of nothing and another loss making order (285 aircraft so far all heavily discounted), at a time it wants more and more taxpayers money even as Bombardier plans to start a new Iranian airline in Qeshm ? Now the 285 ‘firm’ orders (excluding 45 x CS300 LOI from Air Canada and including the soon to be cancelled order for 40 x CS300’s to Republic Airways now in Chapter 11 bankruptcy), almost fill Bombardier’s planned 255 (min.) to 315 (max.) delivery positions to the end of 2020, basically all money losing orders some going back to 2009. WHEN will Bombardier’s CSeries make money ? No point in being in any business if there is no long term profitable and sustainable business model. They say break-even by 2020 but that does not add up, even after the $3.3 billion write down on the $5.3 billion program last year (surely over $6.3 billion now and climbing) they must using some accounting “magic” tricks, as the program is still in a very poor financial, sales and production shape today. The Federal government has not committed to the $1.0 billion, 1/3 ownership of the program that none of the top 3 aerospace competitors wanted 7 months ago, and EIS (entry into service) is 12 weeks away with no FAA and EASA certification yet ? The prognosis is not good for the CSeries, even though the aircraft is fabulous but the 100-150 seat market is dubious at best and this market segment has already destroyed the A318 (after 81 deliveries) and the B737-600 (after 69 deliveries) with the CRJ-1000 (44 deliveries in 6 years and $243 million write down last year) soon to follow and is the CSeries right behind it ? By 2020 the duopoly is over, as China’s Comac C919 and Russia’s Irkut MC-21 enter the $150+ seat single aisle market, and Bombardier would be the 5th wheel in a highly contested market, where only the strong will survive and that ain’t Bombardier by any stretch of the imagination ! Coupled to decreasing Business Jet orders and the whole dated product line now under attack by new competitive aircraft , as LearJet 70/75 are dying and company has no future after the cancellation of the LearJet 85, “cash cow” Global 5000/6000 are fading as is the 36+ year old Challenger 650/605/504/601/600 line and the new Global G7000 is going to join the CSeries as the only 2 products for the future, each with its own set of major challenges to success.

READ: Blog article on DAL deal, April 28, 2016 Well the Delta Air Lines (DAL) deal for 75 x CS100’s and 50 options is done, and brings the current order book to 325 ‘firm’ orders, though the 40 aircraft order by Republic Airways (USA) from February, 2010 is out, as that airline is in Chapter … Continue reading

SUMMARY: Delta Air Lines (DAL) has ordered 75 x Bombardier CS100’s and optioned another 50, in a surprise and risky move by the airline. A surprise as it was expected to first replace the 116 x MD-88’s that have 149 passenger seats and the aircraft are 25.5 years old with CS300’s (130-160 seats), but the CS100 (108-130 seat) order means it is more intended to replace the 90 x B717-200s (110 seat) which are 14.4 years old. Risky, because this is a program that was for sale in October, 2015 ( 7 months ago) after a 8 year and $5.3 billion investment, and had only 250 firm orders till today (160 “real” orders) after 8 years of sales and marketing, and now that is up to 325 orders (+ 45 for Air Canada still LOI), but still a very small, and nothing to brag about. A $US 500 million “special charge” (very common these days in Bombardier accounting) will show up in Bombardier’s 2Q/2016 financials to cover the losses on 1st quarter 2016 CSeries sales to DAL (75 x CS100’s), Air Canada (45 x CS300’s) and airBaltic (7 x CS300’s), or $US 3.93 million per aircraft, as that will be the LOSS for those 127 aircraft sold and more losses will come from the 250 ‘firm’ orders it has today ! to sell 370 aircraft below cost takes Bombardier to the end of 2021 production capacity, when will it make money ? Bombardier claims the CSeries will break-even by 2020 ! how ? state subsidies for more “special charges” ? The company is still trying to spin off the CSeries program into a separate limited partnership with the governments of Quebec and Canada for $C 2.6 billion of taxpayers money for a 2/3 share of the new company, so that Bombardier can ‘clean’ up its accounting books and spread the risk, but there is no progress yet as the 2 controlling families do not want to give up majority control. The competition said NO to the CSeries but now Canadian taxpayers are being ‘suckered into investing in a program the commercial industries 3 leading manufacturers said NO to ! Then there still is the fact that even with 12 weeks to go to entry into service (EIS) with Swiss, the CS100 has no FAA or EASA Type Certificate ? certification cannot be left for the last minute, any delay in EIS/delivery will not be good for the CSeries as all eyes are on its EIS and production ramp-up this year, and Canadian Type Certification does not automatically mean an easy ride through FAA and EASA Certification, something to keep an eye on for sure. The DAL order is a major WIN for the CSeries order book which has not had a new order since September, 2014 and yet it is surely a LOSS for the financial books, as DAL surely got a “sweetheart deal” from a desperate Bombardier, which probably did not have to compete with either Airbus and Boeing for the smaller CS100 order, and only had to face Embraer’s E195/190-E2 program, but still I am sure +/-50% off the list price of $US 74 million per aircraft was negotiated way down (not a $5.6 billion but more closer to $2.8 billion deal) by DAL Chairman/CEO Richard Anderson, an excellent hard ball negotiator and airline executive, who in July, 2015 cancelled a big $US 4.0 billion aircraft deal for 40 x B737-900’s and 20 x E190’s, when his pilots rejected a tentative agreement ! With now 325 ‘firm’ orders (235 “real” orders), the production of the CSeries to the end of 2010 should be full, as Bombardier said it would have produced between 255 and 315 aircraft by the end of 2020. The problem is that some orders go back to 2009/2010 and surely most if not all current orders are money losing deals, with early big discounts (especially long time Bombardier customer Lufthansa), so when will Bombardier make money on the CSeries ? The answer maybe never ! as the market segment for 100-150 seat aircraft has been in decline for 9 years now (only 53 deliveries in 2015 by 4 OEM’s), from its peak in 1991 with 330 deliveries. The segment killed the A319 (81 deliveries), killed the B737-600 (69 deliveries) and presently killing the Bombardier CRJ-1000 with 46 deliveries after +6 years and a $243 million write down in 2015 due to “low demand”, off course ! Yet Bombardier keeps dreaming and believing in its forecast of 7,000 aircraft in the segment over 20 years (350 a year on average, a rate never yet achieved), they are just blind to the reality of the market. A market segment with low demand and low to negative margins is a recipe for disaster, and with Airbus and Boeing out to kill the CSeries for entering their market segment (130+ seats), pricing will be very low, so even when the CSeries does WIN an order, it will LOSE financially, and it is 100% concentrated in the worst market segment at the worst possible time, as airlines are up-gauging fast, and the Airbus and Boeing 150-240 seat single aisle market (A320/321neo and B737Max8/9) today outsells the 100-150 seat market by a ratio of 67:1 ! (7,223 orders vs 110), says a lot about where the market is and more importantly where the market is not ! Boeing starts on its “new” B737Max7.5 to counter the CS300 and to move out of the 100-150 seat market, a shrunk version of the Max8 with 150 seats in 2 class configuration, the battle is on, by 2020 there will be 5 manufacturers in the single aisle market, not everyone will win.

READ: Blog article on Delta Air Lines and Bombardier CSeries of January 21, 2016 plus many articles on the CSeries in past articles It is official, after months of rumors, Delta Air Lines (DAL) has ordered 75 CS100’s from Bombardier with 50 options, the deal could be valued at $US 5.6 billion ($US 74.6 million … Continue reading

SUMMARY: The Bombardier G7000 is the next crisis at Bombardier, the ultra long range market for VIP aircraft above $75 million has averaged only 18 Airbus ACJ and Boeing BBJ VIP aircraft per year since the late 1990’s, so where is the market for the G7000 ? This is another crisis coming at Bombardier that has not been talked about, but competing again against Airbus and Boeing in a very small market (like the CSeries) is another recipe for even more troubles at Bombardier, when you get +100% more aircraft (volume in ft3 and cabin floor in ft2), therefore more comfort and very comparable range (if needed) with the A319ceo/neo and BBJ/BBJMax7 offering. Myopia has blinded the company’s ability to have real foresight and intellectual insight into where they are going with the G7000 and off course the CSeries and the Canadian taxpayers are suppose to bailout this Canadian tax avoiding, job discriminating and mismanaged corporation ? The 39 x Q400 orders and a few options means the line is good till July, 2019 at BEST while the 79 x CRJ orders and few options mean that line is done by May, 2018 at BEST. While the CSeries will struggle, the remaining Commercial Aircraft products are dying a slow death and no way will the 5 year Transformation Plan get to $14.9 billion in Aerospace revenue. While the ‘cash cow’ Global 5000/6000 production rates are cut further from their high of 80 in 2014 (once 43% of Aerospace revenue), there is little left in existing Commercial and Business aircraft products to sustain the company’s revenue ambitions past 2020. The G7000 is heading in the same direction as the CSeries, into a small market segment dominated by the duopoly of Airbus and Boeing, where margins are very low to nil, low demand and low margins combined will create an eventual financial meltdown. Bombardier just got it all wrong, and you cannot change the market, it is what it is. Lastly, Canadian taxpayers will soon have “invested” $C 2.0 billion to own 2/3 of the CSeries program that is destined for failure, a program that Airbus, Boeing and Embraer did not want to buy, but our “corporate welfare” program will ensure that Bombardier cleans up it’s financials by dumping the program into a separate limited corporation that we Canadians will be stuck with, hell or high water. While Canada’s government runs up a huge $C 30+ billion budget deficit and will surely cut back on many programs for Canadians, yet support Bombardier at all cost, as we sadly already have +25% of our children in Toronto and Montreal living below the poverty line. But off course saving Quebec (which had 7 high profile politicians arrested just last week as its massive corruption culture is further exposed to the world) based Bombardier (where the Liberals have 40 seats and the Prime Minister’s home province) is more important politically than looking after down and out Canadians.

I have covered Bombardier’s problems with the CSeries a great deal over the past 3 years, and anyone who has read the articles should by now know that I have been accurate with my predictions of low sales, becoming a ‘penny’ stock, President/CEO Pierre Beaudoin’s move up but unfortunately not out to predicting that Bombardier … Continue reading

UPDATE: The Canadian government is going to put $C 1.3 billion into ailing Bombardier and BAILOUT its CSeries commercial jet program, yet the company AND the Canadian government are NOT revealing past government aid to the manufacturer. In fact, according to latest article in the ‘Financial Post’ both parties suppress any information about Canadian taxpayers support for the company, which in a democracy like Canada’s is outrageous. This is another example of the “corporate welfare” and “crony capitalism” in Canada today, when government and BIG business are bed fellows and there is no public accountability and transparency on billions of dollars of taxpayers money going to aerospace companies. When did we become a “crony state” where taxpayers are not allowed to know where their tax money went to and for what ? They say it could prejudice the competitive position of the company ? are you kidding me ? Everyone knows what a miserable screw-up Bombardier is today thanks to ex-President/CEO and now Executive Chairman Pierre Beaudoin. They tried to sell the CSeries program to 3 OEM’s in October, 2015 surely they gave out financial information on the CSeries program ? and everyone can read public financial statements to see how bad the company’s financials are. Yet, the company is NOT a good Canadian citizen, it hides and parks hundreds of millions of dollars away from our Canada Revenue Agency (CRA), in overseas brass plate corporations so it does not have to pay Canadian taxes that it now so badly needs from us, and has asked 51 times since 1966 for government assistance, that is an average of once a year for the past 50 years, a ‘regular customer’ for state aid and yet Bombardier goes out of its way to unethically hide its money from Canadian taxes yet dares to ask for state aid regularly to help it grow ! shameful corporate hypocrisy at its worst. It discriminates in its employment hiring against English speakers (aka Quebecois nepotism coming from ex-President/CEO directly) and the government has done nothing yet to investigate it, as it is against the Canadian Human Rights Act to discriminate and the company needs to be punished for that. The company sends new work to Mexico and Morocco, as it lays-off thousands of workers in Canada and it wants more and more money from Canadian taxpayers while the Bombardier and Beaudoin family’s that control 54% of the voting shares with only 13% of equity (worth around $US 345 million), don’t want to give up control, thinking they are too BIG to fail ! Probably they are right, off course local Quebec government made no such request of course (wonder why ?), Ottawa is at least trying to change the 2 tier voting system to reduce majority control. If you want taxpayers money, then you have to make it transparent, it is simple. If you don’t want your competitors to know you are being state subsidized and probably running foul of World Trade Organization (WTO) rules, then don’t take taxpayers money and find it elsewhere. After the revelations of Quebec’s Charbonneau Commission into widespread corruption in Quebec, mainly between BIG business and local politicians, I believe that with billions of dollars of taxpayers money out there somewhere and no accountability for it, our RCMP (Royal Canadian Mounted Police) must investigate, as this is how corruption happens in “crony capitalism”, when government and BIG business do their own things behind the closed curtains free of public scrutiny and accountability, especially in Quebec, so let’s get in there and find the money trail before its gone ! Lastly, if the control stays with the existing 2 families, Ottawa must say NO to any further state aid (aka “corporate welfare”), the $C 1.3 billion investment into a new limited partnership that will hold the CSeries program, is scam on the taxpayers of Canada, as Bombardier very well knows that the demand in the 100 to 150 seat market is very low with 9 years of steady decline and only 53 deliveries in that segment in 2015 by 3 manufacturers. Bombardier only has to look at it’s own 104 seat CRJ-1000 program a total commercial FAILURE with only 68 orders and 43 deliveries in 5+ years (only 4 deliveries and a $243 million write down on the program in 2015), add to this the new ‘normal’ on pricing deals in this 100-150 seat segment is now at 50% to 70% off list price, and it all adds up to a market segment that is totally wrong for the likes of a lightweight competitors like Bombardier due to weak demand and low to non-existing profit margins on sales, against the duopoly of Airbus and Boeing determined to crush the CSeries early on. This explains why they wanted to sell it 1 month before Canadian Certification, why else would you sell a program after 8 years of work ? They know where it is all heading and secretly they don’t believe in the program as it has NO FUTURE given the dynamics of what is happening in the market segment today. Canadian taxpayers are being duped into a $C 2.0 billion “investment” that has ZERO chance of being returned, better to buy 91% of all outstanding ‘B’ shares, and have something to show for the $C 2.0 billion. Lastly, when the CSeries becomes and orphan, it will not be the first Canadian jet airliner to fail, I take a quick look at the 1949 built Avro Canada C102 Jetliner, and 3 other jet airliner programs that were very good for there time, but like the CSeries were in the wrong market segment at the wrong time and failed with less than 37 units produced before becoming “orphans” (aircraft who have ‘lost’ their manufacturer or were ‘abandoned’ by their manufacturer).

I have recently written about the hundreds of millions of dollars of Canadian tax payers money Canadair and de Havilland received from the Canadian government in the 1980’s, and that Bombardier now wants $C 1.3 billion from Ottawa to match the $C 1.3 billion it has received from Quebec. For a company that violates the … Continue reading

UPDATE: Bombardier could not sell/dump the CSeries program to Airbus, Boeing or Embraer last year, but it has found a buyer (aka sucker) in the Province of Quebec and most likely the Canadian Federal Government. The two Governments will together invest (aka “throwing taxpayers money out the window”) $C 2.0 billion for what the Prime Minister naively calls a “superlative” (unrivaled/marvelous) aircraft ? that for all it’s acclaim of “game changing” greatness has only 243 orders since 2009 of which 100+ are “dubious” orders from questionable customers that will most likely not happen. If the CSeries is so “great”, why are airlines not buying it ? yet buying the new Embraer E2’s at a much faster rate ? The CSeries is positioned in the 100-150 seat market segment, which has been in a steady decline for the past 9 years now, and had only 53 deliveries last year by 3 OEM’s. This latest call for government assistance is the 51st request by Bombardier since 1966 which can only be called “corporate welfare” or “crony capitalism”, yet Bombardier is still 54% controlled by 2 families with only 13% of the shares, and no interest to put in more money into their own struggling company or willing to lose majority control, yet one of their own, Executive Chairman Pierre Beaudoin, mismanaged the company so badly and wiped away billions of dollars of investors money as the stock value plummeted and billions in corporate net losses accumulated since taking the helm in June, 2008. But thanks to Canadian taxpayers the company and it’s owners will be saved for a little longer as the CSeries will be put into a new limited partnership with its own CEO/President, which will shelter Bombardier financials from the eventual collapse of the program, a great set up for Bombardier, and a major rip off for Canadian taxpayers, again. A better solution would be to take the $2 billion and buy shares in Bombardier directly, which today would get you 1.739 billion ‘B’ shares or 91% of all outstanding ‘B’ shares, at least taxpayers would have a majority ownership in the total Bombardier business which is better than owning the eventual “orphaned” CSeries program, and have nothing to show for it in the end. The current 100 to 150 seat market’s low demand and low pricing (United got $23 million per B737-700 recently) cannot profitably sustain all the players, from Bombardier’s new CS100/300 the Boeing B737-Max7, Airbus A319neo and the Embraer E190/195-E2’s, so who will be the loser ? The Canadian taxpayer off course ! The Bombardier forecast of 7,000 units over 20 years is total BS, garbage in, garbage out as in the last 10 years, only 1,879 deliveries were made in this segment (188 per year average) by 3 OEM’s, now there are 4 OEM’s in this segment with price discounts off list price +50% being the new normal, as Airbus and Boeing are determined to crush Bombardier’s entry into their ‘turf’. Bombardier’s 104 seat CRJ-1000 should be a RED Flag on this market segment, 6 years into the program and only 70 orders (now less with some cancellations) and only 45 deliveries and a very low backlog, with a $243 million write off last year in anticipation that it’s days are soon over. There is a disaster in the making, as very LOW DEMAND combined with very LOW PRICES equals very low or non existing PROFIT MARGINS for Bombardier, which it cannot afford as it will be totally dependent on the CSeries in a few years as its own CRJ and Q400 line are both in the declining stage of their life cycle. I am convinced Bombardier knows the program is a dead end, and that is why they tried to sell it in October, 2015 only 1 month before Canadian Type Certification, does that makes sense anyway ? Now what airline wants to buy an aircraft which has a 25 year life from an OEM that only 5 months was looking to dump it on anyone ?

I expect the Canadian government to give into Quebec’s pressures and provide Bombardier with a bail out of $1.0 billion for a 1/3 share in the CSeries program, joining Quebec which has already committed to invest $1.0 billion into the program , that many experts, including myself believe will fail miserably. This money will be … Continue reading

UPDATE: Bombardier’s 5th round of layoffs in 26 months to affect 7,000 employees, as the company posts a $5.34 billion loss after ‘special items’ like writing off part of the CSeries, Learjet 85 and the CRJ-1000 programs. Recent article in Maclean’s (8.2.2016) confirms that “Quebecois nepotism” is for real at Bombardier and it originates at the top, ex-President/CEO Pierre Beaudoin wanted only French Canadians to be hired (aka discrimination), this is the man most responsible for the current disaster at Bombardier today and who won’t go away. No Canadian company deserves Federal aid if it systematically and deliberately discriminates against any Canadian employees, simple as that. Boeing has won the 2nd round at United against the CS300, this time 25 x B737-700’s were ordered on top of last month’s for 40 x B737-700’s as it is clear that any Bombardier CS300 deals where the duopoly competes head to head with Bombardier, a win will be extremely difficult and when it happens to win one, you can bet it will be extremely costly for Bombardier (e.g. reported 60% off for latest Air Canada order), so where is the light at the end of the tunnel ? There is none, that is why they tried to sell the program in October to Airbus and Embraer, so why would any airline buy the CSeries knowing Bombardier wanted to dump it ? The 100 to 150 seat market had only 53 deliveries in 2015 ! so where is this huge 7,000 aircraft market over the next 20 years (350 units per year) market ? Airbus, Boeing and Embraer have not seen it in years, and dropped their A318 and B737-600 because it was NOT there, and even thought about dropping the A319neo and B737Max7, until Bombardier said it wants to enter the 160+ seat market with its CS500, now all bets are off. Bombardier just has to look at it’s own 100+ seat CRJ-1000, to see the that the segment is dry, for after 45 deliveries (only 25 in backlog) and now it is being slowly written off as few orders are foreseen and existing orders are cancelled, surely a RED FLAG on the 100-150 seat market segment ? No, Bombardier is determined heaven or hell to ignore all signs that go counter to it’s marketing myopia/fantasy. Oh well, their Waterloo will come, juts a matter of WHEN not IF. I will show you what happened to the 100-150 seat market in this article. Bombardier delivers 76 (44 x CRJ’s and 29 x Q400’s and the last 3 x CL415’s), and only 38 orders (25 x CRJ’s and 13 Q400’s) for a sad book to bill of only 0.50 (Embraer delivered 101 commercial jets and took in 223 firm orders, for a book to bill ratio of 2.21), while firm order backlog at Bombardier is an extremely low 79 x CRJ’s and 39 x Q400’s, at best 22 months. Business aircraft deliveries stood at 199, but new orders were 119 but cancellations were a whopping 143 ! (74 x Learjet 85’s and 69 x ??? models), for a net negative order book of 24 aircraft (can’t even do a book to bill ratio) ! has to be worrying. Air Canada’s Letter of Intent (not an order) for 45 x CS300’s plus 30 options, is not a “win” for CSeries really as Airbus, Boeing and Embraer did not compete (even though AC has 69 x B737Max8/9’s on order + 48 options/rights), in fact it was a single sourced order as Quebec drops 4 year lawsuit against Air Canada, and hence the LOI at a reported 60% off ($92.2 million) from the $82 million list price, can’t make money on the CSeries at $32.8 million a piece ! and now every airline will want 60% off ! It is obvious the Air Canada deal was a quick LOI to put some positive spin on the 2105 financials. Smells like coercion or just the “old boys” network in Montreal at play ? Just like Russia’s Aeroflot buying 50+ Sukhoi SSJ-100’s because it has to, Air Canada buys CS300’s because it indirectly has to, the market knows what is going on as do investors (Air Canada stock already low, dropped from $8.41 before the order to $7.15 today a -15% drop in a week). A new 90 seat Q400 ? yes, at a crunching 28″ pitch, great for Asians, useless in North America and Europe. Bombardier “penny stock” climbs to $1.18 today after being as low as $0.77 on February 8th, it ‘hopes’ the Federal Government will give it $1.0 billion like the local Quebec government did 4 months ago. Yet should it get any money from Canadian taxpayers, it discriminates against some Canadian workers, hides $500 million in 2014 in a “brass plate” company in dubious Luxembourg so that it can pay less Canadian taxes, announces 5 rounds of layoffs since January 21, 2014 totaling 13,950 workers, yet more work goes to Mexico and Morocco, and the families that control the company put nothing in ? and expects Government bail-outs of their firm ? while the man responsible for the mess is still Chairman of the Board ? why not help the western oil industry or the +25 % of Toronto’s and Montreal’s children, that today live below the poverty line instead ? Sounds good to me, rather help the children then the Beaudoin’s, Bombardier’s and the investors who still hang around “hoping” things will change.

Bombardier announces it’s 5th round of layoffs in 26 months, this time it is 7,000 over 2 years on top of the previous 4 rounds (21.1.14 -1,700, 23.7.14 -1,800, 21.1.15 -1,700, 11.5.15 -1,750) of 6,950 announced layoffs (total now is 13,950 in just 26 months), as it announces a mind blowing $US 5.34 billion net loss … Continue reading